In the News

In the News

Upcoming Event
June 22, 2017

David Zuber will be speaking at the 2017 OTLA Fall Conference on “Booby Traps, Drones and Land Mines: Surveillance” on November 16, 2017.



Recent Case Law on the Disclosure of Surveillance Evidence by David Zuber and Jordan Dunlop
May 3, 2017

The paper offers recent case law analysis regarding the disclosure of surveillance evidence and its admissibility at trial, both for substantive and impeachment purposes.

Recent Case Law on the Disclosure of Surveillance Evidence – OBA



Workplace Safety Insurance Appeals Tribunal Decision
April 12, 2017

Jonathan Schwartzman was successful before the Workplace Safety Insurance Appeals Tribunal in having the plaintiff’s tort claim from a motor vehicle accident barred on basis of plaintiff and defendant both being Schedule 1 workers within the scope of their employment at the time of the accident.

WSIAT Decision No. 3214 16 dated Jan 3, 2017



Upcoming Event
April 12, 2017

David Zuber will be speaking about Strategic Use of Evidence Obtained at the OBA’s Surveillance and Social Media in Insurance law Program on April 18, 2017.
The program Agenda and his Bio can be viewed here.

Surveillance and Social Media in Insurance Law – Agendas

Surveillance and Social Media in Insurance Law – Speaker Bios



Cousins v. RDHR Investments
February 9, 2017

Jordan Dunlop was successful in defending a fast food chain restaurant in a lawsuit brought by a plaintiff who claimed she injured her tooth when she bit into metal debris found in a pita. Although the plaintiff was treated for a chipped tooth following the alleged incident, the jury found that the restaurant was not liable.

Read more here.



Iannarella v. Corbett
February 9, 2017

David Zuber and Crystal Gillis were recently successful in appealing a Master’s decision to award the defendants a further defence medical with a new orthopedic expert. The Appeal judge found that there was no evidentiary basis to support the Master’s findings of fact, such that there was a palpable and overriding error.

Read more here.



Arteaga v. Poirier
November 4, 2016

At the conclusion of trial conducted by Joseph Villeneuve and Agatha Dix for the defendants, with jury verdict given, the plaintiff moved for Judgment for $2,000 as the sole amount to be paid by the defendants net of deductible for general damages which reduced that award to zero, and reduction of special damages for collateral benefits received. The defendants opposed the motion on the basis that the net amount must be zero with the $2,000 reduced by deductibility of housekeeping benefits received by the plaintiff via statutory accident benefits. The defendants further argued their entitlement to costs as based on net award of zero, while the plaintiff argued entitlement to her costs based on net award of $2,000. The defendants as represented by Jonathan Schwartzman and Agatha Dix, were successful on the deductibility issue thereby resulting in a Judgment dismissing the action, with costs ordered payable to the defendants in the amount of $138,416.42.

Read more here



RBC Insurance v. Field
November 1, 2016

Dan Fiorita was recently successful in obtaining judgement in favour of an Insurer recovering payments for accident benefits and property loss that were wrongfully paid due to the claimant’s wilful misrepresentation and fraudulent conduct. Punitive damages were also awarded against the claimant.

Read more here



1791949 Ontario Limited ats Daigneault
November 1, 2016

David Zuber recently responded to an appeal of an Order requiring a plaintiff who split his time between Quebec and Florida to post substantial security for costs. Mr. Zuber was successful and the plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed with costs.

Read more here



Chrysler Financial ats Graham
November 1, 2016

David Zuber was successful in defending CorePointe Insurance and Daimler Chrysler Financial Services against a lawsuit brought by an injured passenger who claimed that Daimler Chrysler was responsible as the lessor of the defendant vehicle and CorePointe had to indemnify the underinsured defendant driver. This case upheld the Insurance Act amendments, section 267.12(1) that limit the liability of leasing companies and their insurers to $1 million. Leave to the Supreme Court of Canada was sought by the plaintiffs but was dismissed.

Read more here.



Page 1 of 3: 1 2 3